Manchester United is a fading power, at least in squad strength, who will struggle to launch any serious grab for the English Premiership title. They have already had a disappointing start to the season, earning only four points from three matches. There is a large gap between United, and Chelsea and Arsenal, with both the latter earning all twelve points from four matches.
Admittedly, Manchester United has been hampered by plenty of injuries, as well as the Olympic Games and a ban. Strikers Ruud Van Nistelrooy and Louis Saha have missed much of the start of the 2004/2005 campaign due to injury, while Wes Brown and Roy Keane have been other important players that have been plagued by injury. Important winger Cristiano Ronaldo missed much of the campaign due to the Olympic Games, while expensive Rio Ferdinand has been serving an eight-month ban due to being found guilty of missing an official drug test.
However, I would not rate Manchester United, even with the squad at full strength. By "not rating", I mean as a title contender in the same league as Arsenal and Chelsea. Manager Sir Alex Ferguson would argue that his squad is almost one of his best ever. Recently, it was reported Ferguson
enthused that his squad would be stronger than that of 1999 if he managed to land English star striker Wayne Rooney. Of course, in 1999, Manchester United won the lucrative European Champions League.
I would be inclined to disagree. Adding Rooney to the squad would not make their squad Champions League winner material. In fact, signing Rooney would not improve the squad much at all. He would merely be an addition to an already strong attacking squad, which already contains Van Nistelrooy, Saha, and Alan Smith. They can all hold a first team place in their own right.
I do not deny that United have an extremely strong squad. They are missing one or two players, however. More specifically, they are lacking the midfield that won them a Champions League trophy. United are sorely missing David Beckham in their midfield after his departure to Spanish side Real Madrid more than a season ago, and Roy Keane is no longer the player he once was.
Sir Ferguson has recently been playing John O'Shea in midfield, in fact, in an attempt to train him into that position. That is a damning comment on Manchester United's midfield strength, even if the knighted manager claims that he wanted to train O'Shea into a midfielder anyway.
Young Portuguese winger Ronaldo has been the only notable midfield signing that Ferguson has brought in since Beckham's exit and Keane's peak. He will improve, but he does not yet adequately fill in the hole Beckham left, although the England captain left a big hole to fill. Quite simply, Ronaldo is not enough. Ferguson needs to buy more midfielder of note before being serious contenders for the title, mixing it with Arsenal and Chelsea.
As mentioned already, I consider Chelsea and Arsenal to be the only clubs who has a real chance at winning the title. If pressed for an answer on the question of who will finish on top in the English Premier League, I would have to say Arsenal.
Chelsea simply does not look like a classy team, as opposed to Arsenal. Despite watching Chelsea win twelve points from four matches, they do look shaky. New manager Jose Mourinho is making them play defensively, which is one of the reasons why they are shaky, even if they have only conceded one goal. Playing such a regular defensive game in the EPL is simply unheard of, so of course the players are not looking comfortable at all.
Only an attacking style will allow Chelsea to win the EPL, as a decent team, especially Arsenal, should crack the shaky and defensive Chelsea right open. I could be wrong, of course. Perhaps the Chelsea players will quickly adjust and make themselves the formidable fortress. However, I cannot honestly see it happening.
If there were one thing I must praise Mourinho for, it would be his desire to make Chelsea play defensively. My main criticism of the style of play in England is that there is hardly any focus on defense, thus defenders are underdeveloped. If Chelsea can win the EPL playing this way, then it could be the start of a tactical revolution in England, which would allow all players in England to develop into better players. I would argue that those playing in England are suffering due to this style of play, especially on the international stage, but that argument is for another time.
I fancy Arsenal to win the EPL. They have a developed squad that has undergone little change over the last couple of seasons, and are very well established, especially compared to the ever-changing Chelsea squad. The Arsenal players communicate well on the field, know each other's game well, and every position on the field is well filled by top class players. Some are even world class players, especially in the form of forward Thierry Henry, and midfielder Patrick Vieira.
On top of that, Arsenal has a strong, attractive, and attacking style of play that terrorises almost any team that they come across. They have scored 16 goals in four matches, in fact, an average of four goals a match. Their recent 5 - 3
win against Middlesbrough only further champions their cause.
In conclusion, my verdict is that Arsenal is too established and attacking to be knocked off by a shaky, defensive, and changed Chelsea squad. Manchester United is fading, and some signings off the pace.